Nevertheless , ambitions for expansion have not changed , but the strongest wage war through the smallest to gain influence and define their sphere of domination . Also , the proxy war was the strong
If up to now some thought that they were fighting for noble ideas , it remains no less true that wars in poor countries supported by the rich countries are only wars of geostrategic manipulation which allow the strongest to make the pawns move on their checkerboard . So , we can say without being mistaken that rich countries think war , when poor countries fight wars to weaken themselves and make the strong even stronger . It is pernicious , of course , but this is a reality that does not su er from any doubt .
It does not matter the religion through which war is sold to the poorest ; the results are always the impoverishment of the poorest who wage war with the direct consequence of creating a relationship of point of the Cold War with two worlds , the socialist servitude towards the strongest who often financed the bloc and the capitalist bloc , clashing in almost all war as is the case today in Libya where the puppets that theaters of operations , from Afghanistan to succeeded the collapse of the " autocratic " regime of Mozambique via Colombia , or the Iran-Iraq Muammar Gadafi , survives only thanks to their foreign conflict . sponsors who once financed and supported the pseudo If historians of wars since are satisfied to tell in anti-Kadafi revolution . And it will also be the same for spite of the censorship , what really happened , Ukraine once the war will end in chaos , it will only chroniclers of war information have until now , survive thanks to its Western pimps . purposefully or not failed in the interpretation of The promotion of democracy is similar to the bellicose paradigms , even if some have tried to Christianity of Constantine , so much is it a religion in explain what was happening in their time , it was which its promoters at first do not believe in it not easy until then to understand , or to say that the themselves , because they know how to look at each war had since changed its paradigm . other to see what deceit has always been theirs from the start . But it often happens , as in the Christianity of Constantine , that the followers and the victims of a Machiavellian concept end up becoming its greatest ardent defenders , far exceeding the faith of the original promoters of the concept , defending it better than the latter and sometimes even turning this concept against those who initially promoted it once they notice that even the founding fathers of the concept do not respect it to the letter . They take it upon themselves to enforce the concept . Also , if the West has trouble with a good part of the peoples of the terrestrial globe , it is because the latter , watered in the ideas of freedom and democracy for some time , realize that the West has hard time to apply these principles to itself , and prefer to merge into shameful stutters . Logically , this sulphureous doctrine of double standards has since thrown total discredit on the notions of freedom and democracy dear to France , England or the United States . These less well-o countries , which are now addicted to democracy and freedoms , find it di cult to understand why before bombing a country like Libya or Iraq , the Libyan or Iraqi people were not asked to vote for yes or no , to military interventions in their countries . From the paradigm of wars for economic profits , which has greatly enriched the West since at least Christopher Columbus with the story of the annihilation of Native Americans and slavery , we are moving to the paradigm of force for peace vector of prosperity .
14
Flashmag ! Issue 136 December 2022