18
Flashmag! Issue 167 December 2025
But behind these technical reforms lay a much older ambition. An ambition that dated back to 1865, to that defeat that some had never accepted. They called themselves The Heirs. Not the heirs of the Confederacy— oh no, they were too clever for that. They spoke of“ American heritage,”“ founding values,” and“ returning to our roots.” Clean, sanitized, acceptable words. But in their private meetings, they knew exactly what they were building: a Confederacy 2.0. Cleaned up, made up, digitized. But essentially the same. The method: never name the beast The genius of their strategy lay in a simple principle: never say what you’ re really doing. They never said,“ We are going to marginalize minorities.” They said,“ We are going to restore meritocracy.” They never said,“ We are going to rewrite history.” They said,“ We are going to modernize educational programs.” It was a language game of surgical precision. Every word was tested, refined, made acceptable. And it worked. A progressive senator tried to warn people: What they are proposing is a return to the darkest hours of our history. His opponent smiled condescendingly: My colleague is exaggerating. We are simply talking about administrative efficiency. The audience applauded. The senator lost his seat in the next election.
Act II: The Architecture of Oblivion Chapter 1: The bleeding archives
Sarah Washington had been an archivist at the Library of Congress for thirty years. One Thursday morning in 2026, she received a directive: several collections were to be“ reevaluated” for“ space optimization.” The list made her blood run cold:
“ Buffalo Soldiers Testimonials” collection > Low priority“ Tuskegee Airmen” archives > To be digitized( then removed from physical storage)“ Civil Rights Movement” collection > Reclassification required.
18