...............1o................
and philosophers and sociologists are talking about post humanism, a paradigm that deals with the impact of technologies in human evolution, an evolution that seems to become a devolution.
Jean-Michel Besnier Professor of Philosophy at the Paris-Sorbonne University in his book "L'homme simplifié" (the simplified man), considers that for the modern human being to be in harmony with machines it should reduce, to the simplest expression his behavior to “Harmonize” with machines. A simplification of the individual, which is not without risk because ultimately it will eventually take the best on what makes human beings, humans. When you trust the memory of your phone to keep even the most important numbers, somewhere you end up losing the memorial potential as a human being. The habit being a second nature, the post human term sums up the idea that humans will no longer be humans with the continuous influence of technology. The virtual dialogue, on the other hand, would create an outgrowth of the human being, an avatar that would be created to respond to certain fantasies. Sincerity in this scheme takes an irreversible blow, in the interaction between individuals.
However, it is important to note that if the common members of the consumer mass will be reduced more and more to their simplest expression; A caste of new gods creating technology to fulfill the prayers of the masses or more sincerely, generating needs to the masses to exploit them by the solution of their technology, to become the super rich. This caste, which has arrogated itself the right to think for others, would use technology to maintain its power over the masses. The takeover of Internet and computerization of everyday life will inevitably lead to the loss of fundamental freedoms, and the right to privacy will certainly suffer.
Technology evolves and humanity regresses
Albert Einstein said once 'I fear the day when technology will replace human interactions. We will then have created a generation of IDIOTS. Also there is a growing perception that technology for the man of our era is becoming a dangerous toy in the hands of unconscious children. It is not only science that would be unconscious as François Rabelais thought in the Middle Ages, but it would make unconscious as of today . More than ever, whole sections of human society. Far from evolving concurrently with technology, human beings Conversely tend to regress, including from the social point of view.
Technology has always profoundly influenced society, creating clashes in the process. Also the luddites these English weavers, who between 1811 and 1816 engaged in a movement of protest against the growing reign of machines, manifestations which were repressed in the blood, were perhaps not all wrong, and far from being satisfied with a Selfish preservation of their craftsmanship as some accused them, it is no longer quite illusory to say that, if they firmly believed that machinism would negatively influence human relations in the long term, they were visionaries, because current facts Seem to agree with them.
Human empathy, which diminishes in proportion to technological progress, raises many questions. So, more and more, philosophers,